Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 272 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barbara Payne v. Michael Pauley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barbara Payne v. Michael Pauley Anchor | green | “conclusory allegations, unsupported by specific facts,” | 84 |
| 2 | Spurling v. C & M Fine Pack, Inc. | green | “shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 63 |
| 3 | Spurling v. C & M Fine Pack, Inc. | green | “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 43 |
| 4 | Faas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. | green | “a genuine issue of material fact arises only if sufficient evidence favoring the nonmoving party exists to permit a jury to return a verdict for that party.” | 25 |
| 5 | Reid v. Neighborhood Assistance Corp. of America | green | “court may not assess the credibility of witnesses, choose between competing inferences or balance the relative weight of conflicting evidence.” | 25 |
| 6 | Robert Holleman v. Dushan Zatecky | green | “qualified immunity is an affirmative defense, but once it is raised the burden shifts to the plaintiff to defeat it.” | 12 |
| 7 | Eugene Sparing v. Village of Olympia Fields and Officer James Keith | green | “to overcome qualified immunity, the facts viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff must 'show that the defendants violated a constitutional right' and that 'the right was clearly established at that time.” | 10 |
| 8 | Spurling v. C & M Fine Pack, Inc. | green | “summary judgment is proper if the moving party 'shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.