Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Board of Trustees New Orleans Employers International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Board of Trustees New Orleans Employers International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Co. Anchor | green | “the standard of review for a bench trial is well established: findings of fact are reviewed for clear error and legal issues are reviewed de novo.” | 11 |
| 2 | Reed v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. | green | “unjustified, without reasonable or probable cause or excuse.” | 9 |
| 3 | Water Craft Management LLC v. Mercury Marine | green | “a finding is clearly erroneous if it is without substantial evidence to support it, the court misinterpreted the effect of the evidence, or this court is convinced that the findings are against the preponderance of credible testimony.” | 5 |
| 4 | Block v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. | green | “reasonable and legitimate question as to the extent and causation of a claim, bad faith should not be inferred from an insurer's failure to pay within the statutory time limits when such reasonable doubts exist.” | 4 |
| 5 | Reed v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. | green | “based on random choice or personal whim, rather than reason or system,” | 4 |
| 6 | Harold \D\" Ayers v. United States" | green | “the resolution of conflicting testimony and the making of credibility choices are within the province of the court sitting without a jury, subject only to the clearly erroneous standard.” | 3 |
| 7 | Boudreaux v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. | green | “(i) that the insurer received a satisfactory proof of loss, (ii) that the insurer failed to pay the claim within the applicable statutory period, and (iii) that the insurer's failure to pay was arbitrary and capricious.” | 3 |
| 8 | Ibrahim v. Hawkins | green | “that amount over which reasonable minds could not differ.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.