Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from SEC v. Platforms Wireless Intern. Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SEC v. Platforms Wireless Intern. Corp. Anchor | green | “disgorgement is designed to deprive a wrongdoer of unjust enrichment, and to deter others from violating securities laws by making violations unprofitable.” | 14 |
| 2 | Fish v. Kobach | green | “no indication in the act's text that congress intended to constrain or otherwise guide the traditional exercise of equitable jurisdiction in weighing whether an injunction should issue.” | 14 |
| 3 | FTC v. Consumer Defense, LLC | green | “places a lighter burden on the commission than that imposed on private litigants by the traditional equity standard; the commission need not show irreparable harm to obtain a preliminary injunction.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.