Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Novak v. MetroHealth Medical Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Novak v. MetroHealth Medical Center Anchor | green | “entry of summary judgment is appropriate 'against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.” | 15 |
| 2 | Skowronek v. American Steamship Co. | green | “must draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party” | 15 |
| 3 | Novak v. MetroHealth Medical Center | green | “the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 7 |
| 4 | Schafer v. Rapp (In Re Rapp) | green | “cross motions for summary judgment do authorize the court to assume that there is no evidence which needs to be considered other than that which has been filed by the parties.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.