Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from E.K. v. J.R.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | E.K. v. J.R.A. Anchor | green | “the purpose of the pfa act is to protect victims of domestic violence from those who perpetrate such abuse, with the primary goal of advance prevention of physical and sexual abuse.” | 15 |
| 2 | S.G. v. R.G. | green | “assessing the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be accorded to their testimony is within the exclusive province of the trial court as the fact finder.” | 12 |
| 3 | Buchhalter v. Buchhalter | green | “in the context of a pfa case, the court's objective is to determine whether the victim is in reasonable fear of imminent serious bodily injury....” | 6 |
| 4 | Fonner v. Fonner | green | “while physical contact may occur, it is not a pre-requisite for a finding of abuse under section 6102(a)(2) of the act.” | 5 |
| 5 | Burke Ex Rel. Burke v. Bauman | green | “while physical contact may occur, it is not a pre-requisite for a finding of abuse under section 6102(a)(2) of the act.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.