Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Rocco M..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Rocco M. Anchor | green | “while evidence of past conduct may be probative of current conditions, the question under section 300 is whether circumstances at the time of the hearing subject the minor to the defined risk of harm.” | 17 |
| 2 | In Re Petra B. | green | “facts supporting allegations that a child is one described by section 300 are cumulative.” | 10 |
| 3 | In Re LYL | green | “the court need not wait until a child is seriously abused or injured to assume jurisdiction and take the steps necessary to protect the child.” | 5 |
| 4 | In Re Jamie M. | green | “the question under section 300 is whether circumstances at the time of the hearing subject the minor to the defined risk of harm” | 4 |
| 5 | In Re Carlos T. | green | “the question under section 300 is whether circumstances at the time of the hearing subject the minor to the defined risk of harm” | 3 |
| 6 | In Re Heather A. | green | “from the substantial risk of encountering the violence and suffering serious physical harm or illness from it.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.