Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly Anchor | green | “evidence of substance and relevant consequence having the fitness to induce conviction in the minds of reasonable men.” | 31 |
| 2 | Commonwealth, Cabinet for Human Resources, Interim Office of Health Planning & Certification v. Jewish Hospital Healthcare Services, Inc. | green | “whether the agency's decision was supported by substantial evidence or whether the decision was arbitrary or unreasonable.” | 3 |
| 3 | Martin v. Commonwealth | green | “a person is not guilty of criminal facilitation when: (1) the crime facilitated is so defined that his conduct is inevitably incident to its commission.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.