Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Small v. Horn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Small v. Horn Anchor | green | “we believe that the same distinction between ownership and possession applies in the context of takings.” | 6 |
| 2 | Zirkle v. City of Kingston | green | “the constitutional prohibitions against taking private property without just compensation applies with full force and validity to personal property.” | 6 |
| 3 | State v. Tester | green | “it is made to appear from the face of the statute that the legislature would have enacted it with the objectionable features omitted . . . .” | 6 |
| 4 | Duck River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of Manchester | green | “the constitutional prohibitions against taking private property without just compensation applies with full force and validity to personal property.” | 6 |
| 5 | Pryor-El v. Kelly | green | “where an inmates personal property is seized and sent to an address of his choosing, such an action is not a deprivation.” | 6 |
| 6 | State of Tennessee v. Jacqueline Crank | green | “to completely re-write or make-over a statute.” | 6 |
| 7 | Horne v. Department of Agriculture | green | “real property, or improvements to real property . . . .” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.