Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Harrison v. United States Postal Service.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harrison v. United States Postal Service Anchor | green | “entitled to relief under any legal theory which might plausibly be suggested by the facts alleged.” | 14 |
| 2 | Ivan N. Schatz Joann B. Schatz v. Mark E. Rosenberg Mer Enterprises, Incorporated Stephen Jaeger Weinberg & Green | green | “in the light most favorable to plaintiff.” | 13 |
| 3 | Harrison v. United States Postal Service | green | “must not dismiss the complaint unless it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any legal theory which might plausibly be suggested by the facts alleged.” | 8 |
| 4 | Harrison v. United States Postal Service | green | “must not dismiss the complaint 'unless it appears to a certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any legal theory which might plausibly be suggested by the facts alleged.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.