Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Thacker v. Commonwealth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thacker v. Commonwealth Anchor | green | “the law does not presume, because an assault was made with a weapon likely to produce death, that it was an assault with the intent to murder.” | 6 |
| 2 | United States v. Malek Lassiter | green | “(1) a specific intent to kill the victim and (2) some overt act in furtherance of that intent.” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. Valentino Darosa | green | “in reviewing a conviction after a jury trial, we construe the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, assuming its credibility, and drawing all favorable inferences from it.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. Valentino Darosa | green | “we must sustain the jury's verdict if any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 6 |
| 5 | United States v. Makel Elboghdady | green | “the district court's factual conclusions for clear error . . . and its legal conclusions de novo.” | 6 |
| 6 | Bufkin v. Collins | green | “does not decide for itself whether the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 6 |
| 7 | Bufkin v. Collins | green | “instead, it construes all evidence and makes all reasonable inferences in favor of the prosecution, and asks whether 'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.