Topic: is evi- dence of immateriality, · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #8910

7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Victoria Druding v. Care Alternatives.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Victoria Druding v. Care Alternatives Anchor
ca3 · 2023
green “is evi- dence of immateriality,” 6
2 United States v. Warren Siepman
ca7 · 2024
green “we review the legal accuracy of jury instructions de novo, but we evaluate their particular phrasing for abuse of discre- tion.” 6
3 Akil Carter v. City of Wauwatosa
ca7 · 2024
green “instructions accurately reflect the law, we will reverse only if it appears that the instructions both misled the jury and prejudiced the defendant.” 6
4 United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc.
scotus · 2023
green “knowledge and subjective be- liefs-not ... what an objectively reasonable person may have known or believed.” 6
5 United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc.
scotus · 2023
green “aware of a substantial risk that its statements are false, but intentionally avoids taking steps to confirm the statement's truth or falsity.” 6
6 William Price v. Carri Scharf Trucking, Inc.
ca7 · 2025
green “drawing all reasonable inferences in that party's favor and disregarding all evidence favorable to the losing party that the jury is not required to believe.” 6
7 Esteras v. United States
scotus · 2025
green “congress cannot anticipate (much less account for) every future statutory skirmish,” 6

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check