2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marriage of MacMillan v. Schwartz.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marriage of MacMillan v. Schwartz Anchor | green | “merely mentioning an argument in an appellate opening brief is insufficient.” | 22 |
| 2 | Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van Duyne | green | “it is not incumbent upon the court to develop an argument for a party.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.