Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Tinsley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Tinsley Anchor | green | “reasonable opportunity to present his contentions” | 26 |
| 2 | People v. Adams | green | “the sentencing court erred by permitting defendant to represent himself at his ultimate sentencing proceeding” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Strohman | green | “defendant's assertions of innocence and coercion were conclusory and belied by defendant's statements during the plea colloquy” | 5 |
| 4 | John v. Toia | neutral | “was sufficiently familiar with the case to make an informed determination on defendant's motion to withdraw the plea” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Rossborough | green | “the record belies defendant's contention that defense counsel took a position adverse to that of defendant in his pro se motion to withdraw the plea, and thus there was no reason for the court to assign new counsel” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.