Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 269 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell Anchor | green | “must balance the competing claims of injury and must consider the effect on each party of the granting or withholding of the requested relief.” | 120 |
| 2 | American Bankers Ass'n v. National Credit Union Administration | green | “there would be no justification for the court's intrusion into the ordinary processes of administration and judicial review.” | 62 |
| 3 | Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo | green | “in exercising their sound discretion, courts of equity should pay particular regard for the public consequences in employing the extraordinary remedy of injunction.” | 49 |
| 4 | National Treasury Employees Union v. Clayton Yeutter, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture | green | “tailored to remedy the harm shown.” | 35 |
| 5 | National Treasury Employees Union v. Clayton Yeutter, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture | green | “narrowly tailored to remedy the harm shown.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.