Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lloyd Brown v. Kinney Shoes, d/b/a Foot Locker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lloyd Brown v. Kinney Shoes, d/b/a Foot Locker Anchor | green | “a resignation is actionable under title vii . . . only if the resignation qualifies as a constructive discharge.” | 8 |
| 2 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. | green | “articulate a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the adverse employment action.” | 8 |
| 3 | Cannon v. Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc. | green | “articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action.” | 7 |
| 4 | Jonathan Thomas v. Jeh Johnson | green | “a plaintiff's prima facie case, combined with sufficient evidence to find that the employer's asserted justification is false, may permit the trier of fact to conclude that the employer unlawfully discriminated.” | 6 |
| 5 | Perez v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division | green | “must have been nearly identical.” | 5 |
| 6 | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. | green | “the burden then shifts to the plaintiff to produce evidence from which a jury could conclude that the employer's articulated reason is pretextual.” | 4 |
| 7 | Silva v. Chertoff | green | “as its phrasing 'nearly identical' suggests, the fifth circuit narrowly construes the 'similarly situated' requirement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.