Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 267 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. John Kevin Talley.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. John Kevin Talley Anchor | green | “the party who challenges the sentence bears the burden of establishing that the sentence is unreasonable in the light of both the record and the factors in section 3553(a).” | 91 |
| 2 | United States v. John Kevin Talley | green | “when the district court imposes a sentence within the advisory guidelines range, we ordinarily will expect that choice to be a reasonable one.” | 75 |
| 3 | United States v. David William Scott | green | “nothing in booker or elsewhere requires the district court to state on the record that it has explicitly considered each of the 3553(a) factors or to discuss each of the 3553(a) factors.” | 74 |
| 4 | United States v. David William Scott | green | “to state on the record that it has explicitly considered each of the 3553(a) factors or to discuss each of the 3553(a) factors.” | 27 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.