Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Neifert-White Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Neifert-White Co. Anchor | green | “all fraudulent attempts to cause the government to pay out sums of money.” | 11 |
| 2 | United States v. Neifert-White Co. | green | “this remedial statute reaches beyond 'claims' which might be legally enforced, to all fraudulent attempts to cause the government to pay out sums of money.” | 8 |
| 3 | United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. Hess | green | “any person who knowingly assisted in causing the government to pay claims which were grounded in fraud, without regard to whether that person had direct contractual relations with the government.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. McNinch | green | “the conception of a claim against the government normally connotes a demand for money or for some transfer of public property.” | 6 |
| 5 | United States v. Bornstein | green | “the conception of a claim against the government normally connotes a demand for money or for some transfer of public property.” | 4 |
| 6 | United States v. President and Fellows of Harvard College | green | “a defendant may be liable if it operates under a policy that causes others to present false claims to the government.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Alemany Rivera | green | “the false statement has the practical purpose and effect, and poses the attendant risk, of inducing wrongful payment.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.