Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 266 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Estrella v. Berryhill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estrella v. Berryhill Anchor | green | “(1) the frequency, length, nature, and extent of treatment; (2) the amount of medical evidence supporting the opinion; (3) the consistency of the opinion with the remaining medical evidence; and (4) whether the physician is a specialist.” | 126 |
| 2 | Cruz v. Barnhart | green | “pick and choose' evidence in the record that supports his conclusions.” | 71 |
| 3 | Hanna Miles v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “we are unwilling to require an alj explicitly to reconcile every conflicting shred of medical testimony.” | 30 |
| 4 | George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “we are unwilling to require an alj explicitly to reconcile every conflicting shred of medical testimony.” | 22 |
| 5 | Cruz v. Barnhart | green | “pick and choose' evidence in the record that supports their conclusions.” | 9 |
| 6 | Hanna Miles v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of Health and Human Services | green | “reconcile every conflicting shred of medical testimony.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.