Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey Anchor | green | “the bankruptcy court plainly had jurisdiction to interpret and enforce its own prior orders.” | 18 |
| 2 | Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey | green | “plainly has jurisdiction to interpret and enforce its own prior orders.” | 13 |
| 3 | In Re: Allegheny Health, Education And Research Foundation | green | “the bankruptcy court correctly determined that the suit was a core proceeding because it required the court to interpret and give effect to its previous sale orders.” | 4 |
| 4 | In Re: Allegheny Health, Education And Research Foundation | green | “we hold that the bankruptcy court correctly determined that the suit was a core proceeding because it required the court to interpret and give effect to its previous sale orders.” | 3 |
| 5 | Gowdy v. Mitchell (In Re Ocean Warrior, Inc.) | green | “within its core jurisdiction, the court may also be called upon to interpret the terms of a confirmed reorganization plan.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.