Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mei Fun Wong v. Holder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mei Fun Wong v. Holder Anchor | green | “persecution is an extreme concept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive.” | 20 |
| 2 | Mei Fun Wong v. Holder | green | “we have emphasized that persecution is an extreme concept that does not include every sort of treatment our society regards as offensive.” | 8 |
| 3 | Huo Qiang Chen v. Holder | green | “threats of persecution, no matter how credible, do not demonstrate past persecution.” | 6 |
| 4 | Lecaj v. Holder | green | “necessarily fails to demonstrate” | 4 |
| 5 | Scarlett v. Barr | green | “to warrant a different conclusion, an applicant must adduce objective evidence that the threat was so imminent or concrete or so menacing as itself to cause actual suffering or harm.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.