Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Karen Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karen Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries Anchor | green | “serves a vital function in the process of remedying an unlawful employment practice.” | 15 |
| 2 | Arcangel Alvarado v. Board of Trustees of Montgomery Community College, Raul Parilla, as President of Montgomery Community College | green | “at liberty to read into administrative charges allegations they do not contain.” | 11 |
| 3 | Cathy Walton v. Thomas Harker | green | “it is well settled that before filing suit under title vii or the adea, a plaintiff must exhaust her administrative remedies by bringing a charge with the eeoc.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.