Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Northlight Harbor, LLC v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Northlight Harbor, LLC v. United States Anchor | green | “authority or competence to hear and decide the case before it.” | 18 |
| 2 | Wright v. New Jersey/Department of Education | green | “it is well-settled that the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing subject matter jurisdiction in order to defeat a motion under rule 12(b)(1).” | 15 |
| 3 | Rotkiske v. Klemm | green | “fundamental principle of statutory interpretation is that absent provisions cannot be supplied by the courts.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.