Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John Zimmerli v. The City of Kansas City, MO.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Zimmerli v. The City of Kansas City, MO Anchor | green | “the party moving for summary judgment generally has the burden of demonstrating the absence of any genuine issues of material fact.” | 19 |
| 2 | John Zimmerli v. The City of Kansas City, MO | green | “there is no genuine issue of material fact when the record taken as a whole could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the nonmoving party.” | 17 |
| 3 | Timothy Thompson v. Crispus Nix | green | “accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge . . . or recommit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.