Topic: consistent, clear, cogent, and compelling. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #91

8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 1,152 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Camery v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Camery v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services Anchor
uscfc · 1998
green “consistent, clear, cogent, and compelling.” 359
2 Cynthia La Londe, Parent of M.L., a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
uscfc · 2013
green “relevant and reliable evidence contained in the record.” 185
3 Alisa Bradley and Ronald Bradley, Parents and Next Friends of Rachel Bradley v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
cafc · 1993
green “within the time period described in the vaccine injury table even though the occurrence of such symptom or manifestation was not recorded or was incorrectly recorded as having occurred outside such period.” 155
4 Cynthia La Londe, Parent of M.L., a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
uscfc · 2013
green “such a finding may be made only upon demonstration by a preponderance of the evidence that the onset of the injury . . . did in fact occur within the time period described in the vaccine injury table.” 140
5 Ryan Burns, by His Mother and Next Friend, Donna Burns v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
cafc · 1993
green “relevant and reliable evidence contained in the record.” 131
6 Camery v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
uscfc · 1998
green “medical records may be incomplete or inaccurate.” 117
7 Camery v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
uscfc · 1998
green “written records which are, themselves, inconsistent, should be accorded less deference than those which are internally consistent.” 51
8 Cynthia La Londe, Parent of M.L., a Minor v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
uscfc · 2013
green “relevant and reliable evidence” 14

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check