Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Flowers.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. Flowers Anchor | green | “because a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy, the right to relief must be clear and unequivocal.” | 18 |
| 2 | RoDa Drilling Co. v. Siegal | green | “(1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood that the movant will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of equities tips in the movant's favor; and (4) that the injunction is in the public interest.” | 11 |
| 3 | Scfc Ilc, Inc. v. Visa USA, Inc. | green | “right to relief must be clear and unequivocal.” | 5 |
| 4 | Scfc Ilc, Inc. v. Visa USA, Inc. | green | “a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy, the right to relief must be clear and unequivocal.” | 3 |
| 5 | Warner v. Gross | green | “extraordinary and drastic remedy.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.