Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Frazer v. Temple University.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frazer v. Temple University Anchor | green | “to establish the requisite causal connection, plaintiff must allege facts to demonstrate either: '(1) an unusually suggestive temporal proximity between the protected activity and the allegedly retaliatory action, or (2) a pattern of antagonism coupled with timing to establish a…” | 10 |
| 2 | Jarzyna v. Home Properties, L.P. | green | “a motion for reconsideration may not be used to give a litigant a 'second bite at the apple,' and therefore should not be 'grounded on a request that a court rethink a decision already made.” | 8 |
| 3 | Rich v. State | green | “a motion for reconsideration may address 'only factual and legal matters that the court may have overlooked' and may not 'ask the court to rethink what it had already thought through-rightly or wrongly.” | 7 |
| 4 | Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp. | green | “or as an attempt to relitigate a point of disagreement between the court and the litigant.” | 6 |
| 5 | Dawn L. v. Greater Johnstown School District | green | “applying title vii jurisprudence to title ix retaliation claim and recognizing that to qualify as materially adverse, retaliation must be such that it would dissuade a reasonable person from making or supporting a report of alleged harassment.” | 5 |
| 6 | Dawn L. v. Greater Johnstown School District | green | “the assessment of whether particular conduct or action can be found to be retaliatory is to be undertaken with particular attention to the attendant surrounding circumstances” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.