Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from LePome v. Berkson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LePome v. Berkson Anchor | green | “when a party's eligibility for a fee award is a matter of statutory interpretation” | 7 |
| 2 | Leven v. Frey | green | “generally, when a statute's language is plain and its meaning clear, the courts will apply that plain language.” | 6 |
| 3 | Meridian Gold Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Taxation | green | “courts generally give great deference to an agency's interpretation of a statute that the agency is charged with enforcing” | 6 |
| 4 | Great Basin Water Network v. State Eng'r | green | “construing the statute in a manner that conforms to reason and public policy.” | 5 |
| 5 | Leven v. Frey | green | “when a statute's language is plain and its meaning clear, the courts will apply that plain language.” | 5 |
| 6 | Davis v. Beling | green | “questions of statutory construction, including the meaning and scope of a statute, are questions of law, which this court reviews de novo.” | 4 |
| 7 | Brunzell v. Golden Gate National Bank | green | “unreasonably and vexatiously extendls a civil action or proceeding” | 4 |
| 8 | Kerala Properties, Inc. v. Familian | green | “we review an award of prejudgment interest for error.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.