Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hartman v. Moore.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartman v. Moore Anchor | green | “official reprisal for protected speech 'offends the constitution because it threatens to inhibit exercise of the protected right.” | 20 |
| 2 | Smith v. Plati | green | “focus, of course, ... upon whether a person of ordinary firmness would be chilled, rather than whether the particular plaintiff is chilled,” | 5 |
| 3 | Perez v. Ellington | green | “the first amendment bars retaliation for exercising the right of association.” | 5 |
| 4 | How v. City of Baxter Springs | green | “any form of official retaliation for exercising one's freedom of speech, including prosecution, threatened prosecution, bad faith investigation, and legal harassment, constitutes an infringement of that freedom.” | 5 |
| 5 | How v. City of Baxter Springs | green | “government retaliation ... in as much as retaliatory actions tend to chill individuals' exercise of constitutional rights.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.