Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 1,149 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Grogan v. Barnhart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grogan v. Barnhart Anchor | green | “meticulously examine the record as a whole, including anything that may undercut or detract from the alj's findings in order to determine if the substantiality test has been met.” | 214 |
| 2 | Vigil v. Colvin | green | “neither reweigh the evidence nor substitute its judgment for that of the agency.” | 195 |
| 3 | Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “if a determination can be made at any of the steps that a claimant is or is not disabled, evaluation under a subsequent step is not necessary.” | 191 |
| 4 | Lax v. Astrue | green | “more than a scintilla, but less than a preponderance.” | 184 |
| 5 | Grogan v. Barnhart | green | “anything that may undercut or detract from the alj's findings in order to determine if the substantiality test has been met.” | 94 |
| 6 | Noreja v. Commissioner, SSA | green | “to determining whether the commissioner applied the correct legal standards and whether the agency's factual findings are supported by substantial evidence.” | 85 |
| 7 | Fischer-Ross v. Barnhart | green | “burden of establishing a prima facie case of disability under steps one, two, and four” | 82 |
| 8 | Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “only if his physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that he is not only unable to do his previous work but cannot, considering his age, education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial gainful work which exists in the national eco…” | 69 |
| 9 | Fischer-Ross v. Barnhart | green | “if the claimant is not considered disabled at step three, but has satisfied her burden of establishing a prima facie case of disability under steps one, two, and four, the burden shifts to the commissioner to show the claimant has the residual functional capacity (rfc) to perfor…” | 35 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.