Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Bates.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Bates Anchor | green | “a permanent nuisance claim accrues when injury first occurs or is discovered; a temporary nuisance claim accrues anew upon each injury.” | 12 |
| 2 | Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Bates | green | “sporadic and contingent upon some irregular force such as rain.” | 6 |
| 3 | Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc. | green | “generally, the question of the plaintiff's diligence in effecting service is one of fact, and is determined by examining the time it took to secure citation, service, or both, and the type of effort or lack of effort the plaintiff expended in procuring service.” | 6 |
| 4 | Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc. | green | “it is the plaintiff's burden to present evidence regarding the efforts that were made to serve the defendant, and to explain every lapse in effort or period of delay.” | 6 |
| 5 | Belleza-Gonzalez v. Villa | green | “when an agreement between attorneys or parties delays an appellant from obtaining service on appellees, that agreement must meet the requirements of rule 11.” | 4 |
| 6 | Holt v. D'Hanis State Bank | green | “relevant inquiry is whether the plaintiff acted as an ordinarily prudent person would have acted under the same or similar circumstances and was diligent up until the time the defendant was served.” | 3 |
| 7 | Graham v. Pirkey | green | “a permanent nuisance claim accrues when injury first occurs or is discovered; a temporary nuisance claim accrues anew upon each injury.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.