Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stokes v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stokes v. State Anchor | green | “the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.” | 10 |
| 2 | Stokes v. State | green | “all that due process requires in the post-conviction setting is that the defendant have 'the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.” | 9 |
| 3 | Frazier v. State | green | “is to afford a petitioner the full and fair consideration of all possible grounds for relief.” | 9 |
| 4 | House v. State | green | “the opportunity to present proof and argument on the petition for post-conviction relief.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.