Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wasatch Property Management v. Degrate.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wasatch Property Management v. Degrate Anchor | green | “when attempting to ascertain the ordinary, usual meaning of a word, courts appropriately refer to the dictionary definition of that word.” | 14 |
| 2 | Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova | green | “in interpreting ceqa, we accord the guidelines great weight except where they are clearly unauthorized or erroneous.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.