Topic: the who, what, when, where and how: the first paragraph of … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #9439

7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Moise Katz, Robert I. Harwood v. Household International, Incorporated, Donald C. Clark, and Edwin P. Hoffman.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Moise Katz, Robert I. Harwood v. Household International, Incorporated, Donald C. Clark, and Edwin P. Hoffman Anchor
ca7 · 1996
green “the who, what, when, where and how: the first paragraph of any newspaper story.” 7
2 In Re Michael v. Frierdich, Sr., Debtor v. Steven v. Mottaz, Trustee of the Estate of Michael v. Frierdich, Sr. v. Beverly Oswald
ca7 · 2002
green “direct proof of actual intent to defraud is not required-indeed, it would be hard to come by-and a trustee can prove actual intent by circumstantial evidence.” 6
3 Balaber-Strauss v. Sixty-Five Brokers (In Re Churchill Mortgage Investment Corp.)
nysb · 2000
green “not disproportionately small as compared with the value of the property or obligation obtained.” 6
4 Kipperman v. Onex Corp.
gand · 2009
green “courts will not look with hindsight at a transaction because such an approach could transform fraudulent conveyance law into an insurance policy for creditors.” 6
5 PSN Liquidating Trust v. Intelsat Corp. (In Re PSN USA, Inc.)
ca11 · 2015
green “under 548, in assessing the "value” 6
6 Creditor's Committee of Jumer's Castle Lodge, Inc. v. D. James Jumer
ca7 · 2007
green “because the iufta is a uniform act, we may look to cases decided under 11 u.s.c. 548 , as well as cases interpreting other states' versions of the ufta to determine the meaning of the phrase 'reasonably equivalent value.” 4
7 Baldi v. Samuel Son & Co., Ltd.
ca7 · 2008
green “because the iufta is a uniform act, we may look to cases decided under 11 u.s.c. 548 , as well as cases interpreting other states' versions of the ufta to determine the meaning of the phrase 'reasonably equivalent value.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check