Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. Anchor | green | “the nature of the injury incurred is inherently undiscoverable and the evidence of injury is objectively verifiable.” | 17 |
| 2 | Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LC | green | “knowledge of injury initiates the accrual of the cause of action and triggers the putative claimant's duty to exercise reasonable diligence to investigate the problem, even if the claimant does not know the specific cause of the injury or the full extent of it.” | 11 |
| 3 | Barbara D. Cosgrove, Individually and as the Trustee of the Charles and Barbara Cosgrove Family Revocable Living Trust v. Michael Cade and Billie Cade | green | “circumstances where 'the nature of the injury incurred is inherently undiscoverable and the evidence of injury is objectively verifiable.” | 6 |
| 4 | Barbara D. Cosgrove, Individually and as the Trustee of the Charles and Barbara Cosgrove Family Revocable Living Trust v. Michael Cade and Billie Cade | green | “the nature of the injury incurred is inherently undiscoverable and the evidence of injury is objectively verifiable.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.