Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Carter.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Carter Anchor | green | “when there are no genuine issues of material fact and, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 12 |
| 2 | Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste District | green | “summary judgment is appropriate when, giving the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences to the nonmoving party, there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 11 |
| 3 | City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc. | green | “the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences when the opposing party's motion is being judged.” | 5 |
| 4 | City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc. | green | “when both parties move for summary judgment, each is entitled to the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences when the opposing party's motion is being judged.” | 5 |
| 5 | US BANK NAT. ASS'N v. Kimball | green | “is required to 'come forward with an opposing affidavit or other evidence that raises a dispute as to the fact or facts in issue.” | 3 |
| 6 | City of Burlington v. Fairpoint Communications, Inc. | green | “both parties move for summary judgment, each is entitled to the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences when the opposing party's motion is being judged.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.