Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp. Anchor | green | “the essential attribute of a patent grant is that it provides a right to exclude competitors from infringing the patent.” | 11 |
| 2 | ACUMED LLC v. Stryker Corp. | green | “infringement may cause a patentee irreparable harm not remediable by a reasonable royalty.” | 7 |
| 3 | Stryker Corporation v. Zimmer, Inc. | green | “the decision to enhance damages is a discretionary one that the district court should make based on the circumstances of the case.” | 6 |
| 4 | In Re EMC Corporation | green | “a 'logical relationship' between the claims linking the underlying facts.” | 5 |
| 5 | Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Eve-Usa, Inc. | green | “(1) demand for the patented product; (2) absence of acceptable non-infringing alternatives; (3) manufacturing and marketing capability to exploit the demand; and (4) the amount of the profit it would have made.” | 5 |
| 6 | Horton Co. v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. | green | “the purpose of rule 20 joinder is to promote trial convenience and expedite the final resolution of disputes.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.