Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain Sr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain Sr. Anchor | green | “when assessing a district court's decision for abuse of discretion, we only reverse if the district court's decision rested on grounds or reasoning that were clearly untenable or clearly unreasonable.” | 14 |
| 2 | State Of Iowa Vs. Robert L. Hanes | green | “we presume juries follow the court's instructions.” | 13 |
| 3 | State of Iowa v. Kelvin Plain Sr. | green | “grounds or reasons are untenable if they are 'based on an erroneous application of the law or not supported by substantial evidence.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.