Topic: the requirement of fairness which compels adjustment in rat… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #9690

6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Ohio Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission Anchor
ohio · 1978
green “the requirement of fairness which compels adjustment in rates to compensate utilities for escalating fuel costs also compels retrospective reconciliation to exclude charges identifiably resulting from unreasonable computations or inclusions.” 8
2 Entex v. Railroad Com'n of Texas
texapp · 2000
green “charging rates for their services other than those properly filed with the appropriate regulatory authority.” 7
3 TXU Generation Co. v. Public Utility Commission
texapp · 2005
green “safe, reliable, and reasonably priced electricity” 7
4 Southwestern Public Service Co. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas
texapp · 1998
green “that the proceeding is one directly devoted to setting rates and is not one peripherally related to rates.” 7
5 Roberts v. Narragansett Electric Co.
ri · 1984
green “specter of retroactive ratemaking must not be viewed as a talismanic inhibition against the application of principles based upon equity and common sense.” 6
6 Roberts v. Narragansett Electric Co.
ri · 1984
green “the specter of retroactive ratemaking must not be viewed as a talismanic inhibition against the application of principles based upon equity and common sense.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check