Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Foster v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foster v. State Anchor | green | “the benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness of counsel must be whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” | 8 |
| 2 | McGilberry v. State | green | “on review, the trial court's determinations under batson are afforded great deference because they are, in large part, based on credibility.” | 6 |
| 3 | Davis v. State | green | “included among those reasons: age, demeanor, marital status, single with children, prosecutor distrusted juror, educational background, employment history, criminal record, young and single, friend charged with crime, unemployed with no roots in community, posture and demeanor i…” | 6 |
| 4 | White v. State | green | “it is fundamental and essential to our form of government that all persons charged with a crime have the right to a fair trial by an impartial jury.” | 5 |
| 5 | Cabello v. State | green | “mississippi law on the subject of change of venue has been primarily summarized in the cases of cabello v. state, 490 so.2d 852 (miss.1986); wiley v. state, 484 so.2d 339 (miss.1986); fisher v. state, 481 so.2d 203 (miss.1985); johnson v. state, 476 so.2d 1195 (miss.1985); and t…” | 4 |
| 6 | Simmons v. State | green | “the right to personal presence at all critical stages of the trial and the right to counsel are fundamental rights of each criminal defendant.” | 3 |
| 7 | Hall v. State | green | “under this court's standard of review, the admissibility of evidence rests within the trial court's discretion.” | 3 |
| 8 | Hall v. State | green | “unless his judicial discretion is abused, this court will not reverse his ruling.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.