Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State of Arizona v. Homer Ray Roseberry.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State of Arizona v. Homer Ray Roseberry Anchor | green | “if it is legally correct for any reason.” | 17 |
| 2 | State v. Woody | green | “an exercise of discretion which is manifestly unreasonable, exercised on untenable grounds or for untenable reasons.” | 12 |
| 3 | State of Arizona v. Homer Ray Roseberry | green | “we will affirm a trial court's decision if it is legally correct for any reason.” | 5 |
| 4 | State of Arizona v. Ronald Bruce Bigger | green | “demonstrate that counsel's conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that he was prejudiced thereby.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.