Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Arizona v. Roberson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arizona v. Roberson Anchor | green | “permit a full opportunity to exercise the privilege against self-incrimination,” | 10 |
| 2 | Minnick v. Mississippi | green | “the merit of the edwards decision lies in the clarity of its command and the certainty of its application.” | 10 |
| 3 | Danny Jones v. Harold Plaster, Sheriff, in His Individual and Official Capacities | green | “the trial court is especially well-suited to resolve challenges to peremptory strikes of jurors because it has observed with its own eyes the very act in dispute.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. Celso Malindez | green | “a racial minority has been struck from the venire.” | 3 |
| 5 | Danny Jones v. Harold Plaster, Sheriff, in His Individual and Official Capacities | green | “the party challenging the selection process must prove that intentional discrimination was a substantial or motivating factor in the decision to exercise the strike.” | 3 |
| 6 | United States v. Garvey Martin Cheek | green | “more than innocuous interventions.” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Howard | green | “no prejudice from its exclusion at the penalty phase of the trial.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.