Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee Anchor | green | “separation from acknowledged public areas may serve to indicate that the separated property is a special enclave, subject to greater restriction.” | 11 |
| 2 | International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee | green | “need only be reasonable, as long as the regulation is not an effort to suppress the speaker's activity due to disagreement with the speaker's view.” | 10 |
| 3 | Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District | green | “in a limited public forum, government is free to impose a blanket exclusion on certain types of speech, but once it allows expressive activities of a certain genre, it may not selectively deny access for other activities of that genre.” | 5 |
| 4 | Tri-State Employment Services, Inc. v. The Mountbatten Surety Company, Inc. | green | “drawing all factual inferences and resolving all ambiguities in favor of the nonmoving party.” | 4 |
| 5 | Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District | green | “allows expressive activities of a certain genre, it may not selectively deny access for other activities of that genre.” | 3 |
| 6 | The Bronx Household Of Faith v. Community School District No. 10 | green | “the distinctions drawn are reasonable in light of the purpose served by the forum and are viewpoint neutral.” | 3 |
| 7 | Travis v. Owego-Apalachin School District | green | “impose a blanket exclusion on certain types of speech, but once it allows expressive activities of a certain genre, it may not selectively deny access for other activities of that genre.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.