Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 canonical passages across 13 cases, quoted by 250 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical Center.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turner v. Baylor Richardson Medical Center Anchor | green | “refrain from making credibility determinations or weighing the evidence.” | 55 |
| 2 | April Cadena v. El Paso County | green | “the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.” | 40 |
| 3 | Boudreaux v. Swift Transportation Co. | green | “burden will not be satisfied by some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts, by conclusory allegations, by unsubstantiated assertions, or by only a scintilla of evidence.” | 31 |
| 4 | Wyatt v. Hunt Plywood Co Inc | green | “if its resolution could affect the outcome of the action.” | 23 |
| 5 | Rogers Vann v. City of Southaven | green | “summary judgment is appropriate only if there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 20 |
| 6 | Danny Delaval v. PTech Drilling Tubulars, LLC | green | “pretext is established either through evidence of disparate treatment or by showing that the employer's proffered explanation is false or unworthy of credence.” | 14 |
| 7 | Leslie Coleman v. United States | green | “summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” | 12 |
| 8 | Mary Harville v. City of Houston, Mississippi | green | “a fact is material if it might affect the outcome of the suit and a factual dispute is genuine if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 12 |
| 9 | Daigle v. Liberty Life Insurance Company | green | “if the employer produces any evidence, which, taken as true, would permit the conclusion that there was a nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse action, then the employer has satisfied its burden of production.” | 10 |
| 10 | April Cadena v. El Paso County | green | “courts must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all reasonable inferences in that party's favor.” | 8 |
| 11 | Byers v. Dallas Morning News, Inc. | green | “must then prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the proffered reason was mere pretext for discrimination.” | 6 |
| 12 | Loggerhead Holdings v. BP | green | “summary judgment should be granted where critical evidence is so weak or tenuous on an essential fact that it could not support a judgment in favor of the nonmovant.” | 6 |
| 13 | Austin v. Will-Burt Co. | green | “in determining whether there is a genuine dispute as to any material fact, i must consider all of the evidence in the record, but i do not make credibility determinations or weigh the evidence.” | 5 |
| 14 | Angela Roberson-King v. State of LA Workforce Cmsn | green | “in conducting a pretext analysis, the court does not engage in second-guessing of an employer's business decisions.” | 5 |
| 15 | Austin v. Will-Burt Co. | green | “consider all of the evidence in the record, but i do not make credibility determinations or weigh the evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.