Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gene Autrey Adams v. Paul Metiva.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gene Autrey Adams v. Paul Metiva Anchor | green | “judge may not make credibility determinations or weigh the evidence.” | 23 |
| 2 | Lord v. Saratoga Capital, Inc. | green | “this requires the nonmoving party to 'put up or shut up' on the critical issues of his asserted causes of action.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.