C.F.R. » Title 10 » CHAPTER II—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › SUBCHAPTER A—OIL › PART 205—ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SANCTIONS › Subpart F—Interpretation

10 C.F.R. § 205.86

Appeal

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

There is no administrative appeal of an interpretation.

(Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-159, as amended, Pub. L. 93-511, Pub. L. 94-99, Pub. L. 94-133, Pub. L. 94-163, and Pub. L. 94-385, Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-275, as amended, Pub. L. 94-385, Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Pub. L. 94-163, as amended, Pub. L. 94-385; E.O. 11790, 39 FR 23185; Department of Energy Organization Act, Pub. L. 95-91; E.O. 12009, 42 FR 46267) [43 FR 14437, Apr. 6, 1978]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1975–1981 · leading case: Atl. Richfield Co. v. Fed. Energy Admin., 556 F.2d 542 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Atl. Richfield Co. v. Fed. Energy Admin., 556 F.2d 542 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1977). “10 C.F.R. § 205.86 . That office denied the appeal in a Decision and Order issued August 8, 1975.”
Condor Operating Co. v. Sawhill, 514 F.2d 351 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1975). “Therefore, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Section 205.86(b), FEA is issuing this Remedial Order.”
Atl. Richfield Co. v. Zarb, 532 F.2d 1363 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1976). “Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR Section 205.86(b), Federal Energy Administration is issuing this Remedial Order.”
Nat'l Distillers & Chem. Corp. & Nat'l Hydrocarbons, Inc. v. Dep't of Energy, 662 F.2d 754 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1981). “Accordingly, 10 C.F.R. § 205.86 was amended in 1978 to provide that “There is no administrative appeal of an interpretation.”
Valero Energy Corp. v. United States Dep't of Energy, 509 F. Supp. 644 (W.D. Tex. 1980). “10 C.F.R. § 205.86 . Although, the regulations provide that formal “interpretations” may be issued only in response to formal written requests for interpretations filed with the General Counsel.”
— 10 C.F.R. § 205.86(b) — 2 cases
Condor Operating Co. v. Sawhill, 514 F.2d 351 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1975). “Therefore, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Section 205.86(b), FEA is issuing this Remedial Order.”
Atl. Richfield Co. v. Zarb, 532 F.2d 1363 (Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. 1976). “Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR Section 205.86(b), Federal Energy Administration is issuing this Remedial Order.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.