C.F.R. » Title 10 » CHAPTER III—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY › PART 903—POWER AND TRANSMISSION RATES › Subpart A—Procedures for Public Participation in Power and Transmission Rate Adjustments and Extensions for the Alaska, Southeastern, Southwestern, and Western Area Power Administrations

10 C.F.R. § 903.13

Notice of proposed rates

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Administrator shall give Notice that Proposed Rates have been prepared and are under consideration. The Notice shall include:

(1) The Proposed Rates;

(2) An explanation of the need for and derivation of the Proposed Rates;

(3) The locations at which data, studies, reports, or other documents used in developing the Proposed Rates are available for inspection and/or copying;

(4) The dates, times, and locations of any initially scheduled public forums; and

(5) Address to which written comments relative to the Proposed Rates and requests to be informed of FERC actions concerning the rates may be submitted.

(b) Upon request, customers of the power system and other interested persons will be provided with copies of the principal documents used in developing the Proposed Rates.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–1993 · leading case: United States v. City of Fulton, 475 U.S. 657 (1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. City of Fulton, 475 U.S. 657 (1986). “10 CFR § 903.13 (1985). They provide all interested persons the opportunity to consult with and obtain information from the PMAs, to examine backup data, and to comment on the proposed rates.”
Overton Power Dist. No. 5 v. Watkins, 829 F. Supp. 1523 (D. Nev. 1993). “They allege that this failure constitutes a violation of 10 C.F.R. § 903.13 (a)(3) and (b). Section 903.”
United States v. City of Fulton, 9 Cl. Ct. 1422 (Fed. Cir. 1986). “10 CFR § 903.13 (1985). They provide all interested persons the opportunity to consult with and obtain information from the PMAs, to examine back-up data, and to comment on the proposed rates.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.