11 C.F.R. § 102.7

Organization of political committees (52 U.S.C. 30102(a))

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Every political committee shall have a treasurer and may designate, on the committee's Statement of Organization, an assistant treasurer who shall assume the duties and responsibilities of the treasurer in the event of a temporary or permanent vacancy in the office or in the event the treasurer is unavailable.

(b) Except as provided in subsection (a), no contribution or expenditure shall be accepted or made by or on behalf of a political committee at a time when there is a vacancy in the office of the treasurer.

(c) No expenditure shall be made for or on behalf of a political committee without the authorization of its treasurer or of an agent authorized orally or in writing by the treasurer.

(d) Any candidate who receives a contribution, as defined at 11 CFR part 100, subparts B and D, obtains any loan or makes any disbursement in connection with his or her campaign, shall be considered as having received the contribution, obtained the loan or made the disbursement as an agent of such authorized committee(s).

[45 FR 15104, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 67 FR 78680, Dec. 26, 2002]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1993–2010 · leading case: Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, Pllc, 683 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2010).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, Pllc, 683 F. Supp. 2d 33 (D.D.C. 2010). “Indeed, according to 11 C.F.R. § 102.7 (c), “[n]o expenditure shall be made for or on behalf of a political committee without the authorization of its treasurer or of an agent authorized orally or in writing by the treasurer.”

Karl Rove & Co. v. Thornburgh, 824 F. Supp. 662 (W.D. Tex. 1993). “§ 432 (a); 11 C.F.R. § 102.7 . Dimuzio’s sole responsibilities as treasurer were to assure compliance with Federal regulations and to develop and implement internal procedures for disbursements and documentation of funds.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.