(a) The national mail voter registration form shall consist of three components: An application, which shall contain appropriate fields for the applicant to provide all of the information required or requested under 11 CFR 9428.4; general instructions for completing the application; and accompanying state-specific instructions.
(b) The state-specific instructions shall contain the following information for each state, arranged by state: the address where the application should be mailed and information regarding the state's specific voter eligibility and registration requirements.
(c) States shall accept, use, and make available the form described in this section.
[59 FR 32323, June 23, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 37520, July 29, 2009]
Notes of Decisions
League of Women Voters v. Brian Newby, 838 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2016).
· cites it 2× “11 C.F.R. § 9428.3 (a). The state-specific instructions must contain certain information for each state: “the address where the application should be mailed and information regarding the state’s specific voter eligibility and registration requirements.”
Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc., 570 U.S. 1 (2013).
· cites it 2× “gov (all Internet materials as visited June 11, 2013, and available in Clerk of Court’s case file); 11 CFR §9428.3 (2012). Each state-specific instruction must be approved by the EAC before it is included on the Federal Form.”
League of Women Voters v. Brian Newby, 963 F.3d 130 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
“” 11 C.F.R. § 9428.3 (b). Although states may, with the Commission’s approval, supplement the registration requirements listed on the Federal Form, they “may require only such identifying information .”
League of Women Voters v. Brian Newby, No. 16-5196 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 26, 2016).
“11 C.F.R. § 9428.3 (a). The state-specific instructions must contain certain information for each state: “the address where the application should be mailed and information regarding the state’s specific voter eligibility and registration requirements.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.