12 C.F.R. § 618.8300

General regulation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Except as necessary in performing official duties or as authorized by Farm Credit Administration regulations (§§ 618.8300 through 618.8330), no director or employee of a bank, association, or agency thereof shall disclose information of a type not ordinarily contained in published reports or press releases regarding any such banks or associations or their borrowers or members.

[37 FR 11442, June 7, 1972. Redesignated at 47 FR 12151, Mar. 22, 1982; 78 FR 77562, Dec. 24, 2013]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1985–1991 · leading case: AgriVest P'ship v. Cent. Iowa Prod. Credit Ass'n, 373 N.W.2d 479 (Iowa 1985).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

AgriVest P'ship v. Cent. Iowa Prod. Credit Ass'n, 373 N.W.2d 479 (Iowa 1985). “CIPCA asserts a privilege based on a regulation appearing at 12 C.F.R. section 618.8300. That regulation provides: Except as necessary in performing official duties or as authorized in the following paragraphs, no director or employee of a bank, association, or agency thereof…”

Interstate Prod. Credit Ass'n v. Fireman's Fund Ins., 128 F.R.D. 273 (D. Or. 1989). · cites it 2× “Under regulations of the Farm Credit Administration, particularly 12 CFR § 618.8300 — .8320, federal law imposes limitations on IPCA and other entities within the Farm Credit System on disclosure of information concerning borrowers or members.”

First Tennessee Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 829 S.W.2d 144 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). “12 CFR § 618.8300 . The regulations further provide that: § 618.”

United States v. Haynes, 620 F. Supp. 474 (M.D. Tenn. 1985). “12 C.F.R. §§ 618.8300 , 8320. 11 . The indictment also charges that, while defendant fully apprised the Federal Intermediate Credit Bank of Louisville ("FICB”) of the financial condition of the Blanton Smith Corporation and the criminal acts of its employees when he applied to…”

Nelson v. Prod. Credit Ass'n of Midlands, 131 F.R.D. 161 (D. Neb. 1989). “289 and 12 C.F.R. § 618.8300 . For the following reasons I conclude that these regulations do not create the “privilege” contemplated by the defendants.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.