13 C.F.R. § 134.220

Prohibition against ex parte communications

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

No person shall consult or communicate with a Judge concerning any fact, question of law, or SBA policy relevant to the merits of a case before that Judge except on prior notice to all parties, and with the opportunity for all parties to participate. In the event of such prohibited consultation or communication, the Judge will disclose the occurrence in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 557(d)(1), and may impose such sanctions as he or she deems appropriate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: Orion Constr. Corp. v. United States, 125 Fed. Cl. 668 (Fed. Cl. 2016).
Orion Constr. Corp. v. United States, 125 Fed. Cl. 668 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “asserts that the SBA’s consideration of ex parte communication with the contracting manager caused Orion to be “systematically excluded from participating in a process that directly influenced the outcome of the SBA hearing” and that, if Orion had been included in the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.